Talk:Clarence Railway

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	April 22, 2014

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article

Article appears to describe two different railway companies under the name of just one. Better to split article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.10.176 (talk) 19:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've started an expansion, and I've found it very difficult to just talk about the Clarence Railway; the Stockton and Hartlepool and West Durham Railways were effectively branches of that railway, even before the whole system merged to be become the West Hartlepool Harbour and Railway. Edgepedia (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clarence Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223025944/http://content.durham.gov.uk/PDFRepository/Auckland_Way_Railway_Path_FINAL_WITH_INTERACTIVES.pdf to http://content.durham.gov.uk/PDFRepository/Auckland_Way_Railway_Path_FINAL_WITH_INTERACTIVES.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Track gauge

What was the track gauge? Peter Horn User talk 17:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whishaw (p. 60) states The gauge of way is 4 feet 8½ inches. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]