Talk:C. I. Lewis

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Epistemology / Logic / Ethics / Analytic / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Epistemology
	Logic
	Ethics
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of C. I. Lewis be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Comments

Any idea where or if one can get his works online?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.210.90.180 (talk • contribs)

On Strict Implication

At 1.2.1 it's said "Lewis's strict implication is now a historical curiosity...". That is just false. --Dante Cardoso Pinto de Almeida (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clarence Irving Lewis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170314083709/http://www.wesleyan.edu/libr/schome/FAs/ce1000-137.html to http://www.wesleyan.edu/libr/schome/FAs/ce1000-137.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 April 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 09:39, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarence Irving Lewis → C. I. Lewis – Per WP:COMMONNAME. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 00:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 11:51, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 00:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This should have a discussion. While Britannica writes him as 'C. I. Lewis' he is in both Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy as Clarence Irving Lewis. EdJohnston (talk) 00:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: Given that both the encyclopedias you cited have a policy of uniformly spelling out initials in the titles of biographies, what bearing would they have on determining common usage? (We can see this, for example, in the SEP biography of G. E. Moore, which uses the subject's full name in the title while also explicitly acknowledging that he was never called by his full name.) 142.160.89.97 (talk) 01:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:Naming conventions (people): "If reliable sources write out several or all of a subject's given names nearly as often as they use initials, prefer the version with the names written in full. Example: Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach and not C. P. E. Bach, although the latter has more Google hits." Full name preferred. — Rgdboer (talk) 02:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, reliable sources do not, in prose, use the name in full nearly as often as they use initials. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 02:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support per this Ngram; references by initials far outweigh the spelled-out name. bd2412 T 22:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

English - major edit.

Sorry, I marked it by mistake as a minor edit