Talk:Clare Stevenson/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Prose is excellent, 9/10.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- "Although keen to serve the war effort in some capacity, she demurred due to the administrative and social obstacles she foresaw." - which were?
- Heh, took a bit of digging just to get that, as my first sources simply said she didn't want to do it initially, without any further explanation - but will add more if I find it. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)