Talk:Clap Clap (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 10:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This shouldn't take too long --K. Peake 10:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good!
• "who wrote it with" → "who served as co-writers with"
• "that stops from being free." → "that stops their freedom." to be less repetitive
• Change to positive reactions part to a few music critics
• Change on 8 July to alongside the single release

Background and composition

• "that stops from being free." → "that stops them from being free."

Reception

• "garnered positive receptions from some" → "was met with positive receptions from a few"
• "music stops playing."" → "music stops playing"." per MOS:QUOTE
• "will keep you dancing."" → "will keep you dancing"."
• "because of the artists […]."" → "because of the artists"."
• "The was listed at" → "The song was listed at"

Music video

• "and followed by a shot of" → "and then a shot of"
• "on a runway and" → "both on a runway and"

Charts

• Good

Release history

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks strong at 16.7%!!!
• Info Music → InfoMusic on ref 3
• Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 17

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went very quickly! --K. Peake 10:47, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

• I greet you @Kyle Peake:, thanks for another review. I've addressed your comments. Cheers Iaof2017 (talk) 17:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, solid job and less than a week after my review! --K. Peake 17:59, 1 December 2022 (UTC)