Jump to content

Talk:Clackline Bridge/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk · contribs) 23:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Looks good, just a few details:

--AdmrBoltz 23:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Admrboltz, thanks for starting a review. I'm away on holiday until Jan 10, and currently on an iPad, so I won't be doing much editing till then, or the next day. Thanks, Evad37 [talk] 23:51, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. --AdmrBoltz 23:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded to your comments above. If you have any comments or suggestions for improving the article to FA-quality, that would be appreciated. Thanks, Evad37 [talk] 09:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will pass this article now. As far as going to FAC, you will want to go to WP:PR as my comments may or may not be helpful in light of how much work my articles need when at FAC. --AdmrBoltz 02:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]