Talk:Civil marriage

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was created as a translation from an article in Hebrew in the Hebrew Wikipedia

My English isn't perfect.. it might still need more grammar improvements. Acidburn24m (talk) 06:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah! :) I don't mind, but I pretty much re-wrote it.24.85.234.200 (talk) 15:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The 1863 claim

I cannot find evidence of which specific Act of Parliament made a change in requirements in 1863. The only marriage act of that year is for Ireland. Mangoe (talk) 11:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not mandatory in the United States

The article should maybe further examine the situation in the United States and try to explain why it has never been mandatory in the US Republic, given that the USA has a strong tradition of secularism, notably in its education laws and in the 1947 Supreme Court decision on the wall of separation. The same line of questions might also be valuable for various other Western juridictions. ADM (talk) 00:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History

An IP inserted this text:

Sorry I do not know how to properly edit here but this statement is simply wrong. Marriage was a civil, state, function long before it was a religious matter. Throughout the Roman Empire marriage was a function of the state and a civil matter as well as a pagan ritual. It was not until the 9th century that the Church had anything to do with marriage when it became a custom of those just married in a civil ceremony to then show up on the church steps to ask the priest to come out and bless their civil union. Marriage was not made sacrament until the 11th century.

It seems to me that the IP knows what (s)he is talking about. Can someone find some sources to formally confirm that the information is correct, so that we can reinsert it? Surtsicna (talk) 14:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above writer is quite well-informed and more research is needed here.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 03:53, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure exactly what is being refered to by the IP as being wrong. This is a complicated matter and needs to be handled carefully: Marriage as religious matter does not equate exactly to marriage as a sacrament (though marriage as a sacrament certainly seems to me to be also a religious matter), therefore the date that marriage became a sacrament is not exactly relevant. The reformers Calvin and Luther, both disagreed with the understanding of Marriage as a sacrament, calling it an "ordinance of God" instead. Marriage can be both a religious and civil matter at the same time according to some (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/noah-manne/marriage-civil-emandem-re_b_139702.html), even if the understanding of it as a sacrament is not held. How are we to understand marriage within Judaism (which pre-dates the Roman Empire), as civil or religious, or both? DMSBel (talk) 18:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that the use of civil marriages before religious ceremonies in France was started after the French Revolution of 1792, however, while doing my husband's Canadien geneology we found that the civil contract was present in all marriages and preceded the religious ceremonies. This policy dated all the way back to the 1620s under Cardinal Richelieu. The crown appointed Royal Notaries whose references in public documents include more marriages and settlement of estates than property transfers. By stating that the idea of civil marriages constituting the primary legal form of marriage only after the Revolution ignores the importance of this policy being present under Church control of civil law.L.s. carbonell (talk) 18:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Civil marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930142016/http://israelinsider.com/Articles1/Politics/9915.htm to http://israelinsider.com/Articles1/Politics/9915.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Civil marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Civil marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in map for Israel and Lebanon

Both states recognize foreign civil marriages (and have extremely popular marriage tourism to Cyprus for that very reason). Israel also recognizes gay marriage that way. -- 217.225.253.3 (talk) 15:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]