Talk:Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Civil engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 15 May 2018.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060721032732/http://www.asce.org:80/pdf/tcfpd-complete.pdf to http://www.asce.org/pdf/tcfpd-complete.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719175917/http://www.aawre.org/files/pdf/HistoryLicensureCPC.pdf to http://www.aawre.org/files/pdf/HistoryLicensureCPC.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ncees.org/About_NCEES/News/News_Pages/Message_from_ED_regarding_engineering_education_requirements.php
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nspe.org/PEmagazine/pe_0408_On_First_Attempt.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI Declaration and Information ...

Greeting Wikipedians, I am a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers organization but editing this article on a volunteer basis without compensation. ASCE did not direct or otherwise guide these edits. I have made these edits strictly adhering to Wikipedia requirements that the entry on the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge be neutral, free of marketing and advertorial content, and properly cited for verification of all information added to the entry. I welcome any input, edits, and feedback from the Wikipedia community in regards to this page. As I have frequently stated when providing disclosure: if you have any questions about my editing activities, please leave me a message on my User Talk page. I am proud of the work I do and intend that my contributions always make Wikipedia better. Cheers .... Risk Engineer (talk) 15:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Evaluation

An initial reading of the article gave evidence of true development. The article gives useful content that can be used as a basis for understanding the idea and history of Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge. As its classification suggests there are some areas that are not as in depth and would encourage readers to look more at references in search of more detail for better motives and reasoning behind some actions taken.Am6320 (talk) 19:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge is a very informative work that outlines the eras of which civil engineering has been in focus. It is one of the oldest engineering disciplines. The article should also incorporate ideas of how the discipline will grow in the future. Also the article should address the many obstacles civil engineering sees in the future.

Kjair715 (talk) 21:28, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Evaluation

The article did seem neutral about the topic it covered. For the most part the citations did work and the links to other articles were correct. In terms of content I believe the article was relevant to the title and did a good job explaining in chronological order the progress of the CEBoK. Changes I would recommend include the following:

First sentence under "Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1918) is not complete
I believe under the title "ASCE Education Conferences (1960-1995) there is a mistake in the 4th sentence. Instead of "A 9168 joint study between ASCE..." the sentence should read "A 1968 joint study between ASCE..."
Under "Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge I believe the second sentence should say "this body of professional knowledge had three components.." since it only mentions three components but it says currently "this body of professional knowledge had four components..."

-Kjt291 (talk) 07:22, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead rewrite - Sept 2018

The body of the article does not seem to match the lead. The lead focuses on the ASCE BOK, while the article has expanded since it's original version to become more of a history of all efforts at a civil engineering BOK. If the lead is rewritten, then several of the older sections towards the end of the article may need rewrites or reorganization. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]