Talk:Cityplace (Winnipeg)

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba.

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

references

Here are some references:

http://www.cityplacewinnipeg.com/

http://canada.archiseek.com/manitoba/winnipeg/downtown/graham_avenue/eaton_place.html

--68.179.16.113 21:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mergeto Winnipeg, Manitoba

Cityplace is not notable or significant outside of Winnipeg. It is notable in, and in the context of, the city of Winnipeg, Manitoba, which is why it should be described in that article. Pan Dan 16:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a big and notable mall, and it should have its own article. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 20:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merger. Information on City Place has no place in the general Winnipeg article, as it is not pertinent to information about the City itself. In my view, the case for deletion is stronger than the case for merger. --207.161.7.220 18:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Opposed. Not clear why this article should be merged, yet the hundreds of other articles on shopping malls shouldn't. It is actually a historic building of some significance, although one wouldn't know it from the article as currently written. Skeezix1000 00:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. --Usgnus 03:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
oppose merger. The article should stand on its own. The article itself could explore the signifigance of the development; historic, political economic, social, etc. Stormbay 03:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Disinclination 04:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nom closing debate given obvious consensus against merge. Pan Dan 09:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]