Talk:Citygarden/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 16:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct? Done - Yes

2. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation? Done - Yes

3. It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout? Done - Yes

4. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines? Done - Yes

5. It contains no original research? Done - Yes

6. It addresses the main aspects of the topic? Done - Yes

7. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail? Done - Yes

8. It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each? Done - Yes

9. It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute? Done - Yes

10. Illustrated, if possible, by images: Done - Yes

(a) Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content? Done - Yes

(b) Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions? Done- Yes

Pass or fail? Pass! Confirms to all criteria. Done