Talk:Citizens for a Free Kuwait

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kuwait (assessed as Low-importance).

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Middle East / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

POV

Viewed in strictly moral terms, Kuwait hardly looked like the sort of country that deserved defending, even from a monster like Hussein.- how much more POV can you get?

This article is too biased to be included in Wikipedia.

The propaganda campaign should be made known.

This should be deleted

Why is this op-ed piece here dressed as an article? JDG 06:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be rewritten as an article about this notable subject, not deleted. Please help. --FOo 21:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it needs to go. If you have legit knowledge of this group then at least write a stub. Page has been listed at AfD. JDG 22:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It exists. It should be on here, but it needs to be made NPOV.

I think it's a Sourcewatch piece, not a copyvio since Sourcewatch is GFDL, but should be credited and NPOV'd. 67.117.130.181 14:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is so POV it's mind-boggling. "Bejewled hands" and a country that did not deserve being defended? This whole article needs to be cleaned up from top to bottom, also sources are missing. Gryffindor 21:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article makes me want to shoot myself, and here's why

Even damned near two years after the first complaints, this article reads like an op-ed piece. Black gold fiefdom, what in the holy hell? Come on, this is a notable subject, but the writing is atrocious. 72.138.111.182 (talk) 08:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

At least some of the article seems to be copied from this source, which is given as an external link: John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton, "How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf," excerpted from Toxic Sludge Is Good For You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry (Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press), 1995.

I've stubbed the article to remove the copyvio. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 04:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Steve Dufour (talk) 06:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Nayirah (testimony) and Citizens for a Free Kuwait

Please see Talk:Nayirah_(testimony)#RfC: Nayirah (testimony) and Citizens for a Free Kuwait. Viriditas (talk) 23:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]