Talk:Circulating tumor cell

Medicine: Hematology-oncology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.

Molecular Biology: MCB Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Figure 1

The numeric left scale is confusing. Should for example CTC's be "10^3 per L" ((ie "10^3 / L"). HalFonts (talk) 17:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The figure suggests that we would only find 1 CTC in 1000 L of blood which doesn't make any sense. Triesault (talk) 00:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How are they formed and what happens to them

A news article in 2012 said it is not know where they come from or what they mean. - If known now could we add to the article ? - Rod57 (talk) 18:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could add more on characterisation and something on heterogeneity

More heterogenous CTCs seems to predict poor prognosis for prostate cancer. Liquid Biopsy Cell Diversity Could Indicate Poor Prostate Cancer Prognosis - Rod57 (talk) 14:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Major expansion of this article is needed

It is both amazing and appalling that the subject of CTC (almost the same as Liquid Biopsy), having a game-changing potential for cancer diagnosis (thus treatment, too) is covered by such a brief article. Interestingly, this subject is almost completely unknown abroad, which is reflected on the list of the related articles in other languages. While needle biopsy often seeds live cancer cells into the bloodstream, it produces differing results for slightly different locations in the tumor, and cannot be repeated often, at the same time Liquid Biopsy is exactly the opposite: it does NOT seed cancer, it identifies large variety of the cancer cells, and can be repeated frequently for monitoring the progression of the disease. How can this article be classified as "low importance"?! This is a huge part of the future of cancer research, diagnosis and treatment. 45.51.77.190 (talk) 22:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Jerry C.45.51.77.190 (talk) 22:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Circulating tumor cell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive {newarchive} to http://veridex.com/CellSearch/CellSearchHCP.aspx
Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.veridex.com/pdf%5CMKG-1767rev3CS-TechnologyAnalyticalOverview_Customer_PresentationFINAL.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Format question

Hi all, new contributor here. As I was adding some information about clustered CTCs, the list format of the types of CTCs didn't seem to fit. I tried to make a minimal amount of changes, leaving the rest of the items in the list. I hope this seems like a reasonable approach and addition. Thanks! MJ-3500 (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]