Talk:Circle route
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Circle route article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Directionality
[edit]In practice, how is the directionality designated and signed (clockwise vs. anti-clockwise)? The traditional designation by terminus is not so useful, because there are at least 2 distinct paths to get to any point on a circle route, starting from a given origin on the circle. Reify-tech (talk) 22:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Moscow Metro has "track 1" and "track 2" without the "clockwise"/"counterclockwise" wording. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.89.66.133 (talk) 10:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Start-Class bus transport articles
- Low-importance bus transport articles
- WikiProject Buses articles
- Start-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- Start-Class Rapid transit articles
- Unknown-importance Rapid transit articles
- WikiProject Rapid transit articles
- Start-Class Streetcars articles
- Unknown-importance Streetcars articles
- WikiProject Streetcars articles
- Operations task force articles
- Passenger trains task force articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages