Talk:Circle of equal altitude

Too Arcane?

I would humbly suggest that a small paragraph of a more popular level of exposition be provided for the benefit of the non-expert reader, for whom the current entry`s content is not only likely to be totally opaque, but also possessed of no indication of where further enlightenment might be found. 2605:C00:1610:6400:CCAA:3D4D:1C4C:77CB (talk) 06:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC)just some general wiki reader and occasional grammar editor, with a very broad curiosity, fond of learning of the world via wiki.[reply]

Agree wholeheartedly. The article says absolutely nothing about what the method consists of ... nor even the theory behind it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:7117:900:D18:BCD2:3648:85E1 (talk) 05:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a short account of the discovery of the method, which may help. Kognos (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]