Talk:Circle Seven Animation

Fair use rationale for Image:Disney circle 7 animation.jpg

Image:Disney circle 7 animation.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Received quite a bit of news coverage in the context of Disney/Pixar corporate maneuverings at the time... -- AnonMoos (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is notable as it was covered by the LA Times and ~~CNN~~ Entertainment Weekly. There was no reason to retag this article on the Notability issue. Spshu (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct date

The date of announcement is not necessarily the date the division when defunct as the source clear states: "Disney Closes Unit Devoted to Pixar Sequels". Los Angeles Times. March 21, 2006. Retrieved October 30, 2011. Thirty-two employees, or nearly 20% of the 168 artists, production managers and support staff, were told they would lose their jobs effective May 26. As they would be working until May 26, 2006, then that is the date of closure/defunct. If the date of announcement was all we had in the article then that is what we would use but we have a definitive last day of work, or day of division operations. Spshu (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]