This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
The only obvious objection is that Wadi Kam refers to a "protected area", not just the river (at least, the article doesn't indicate that it refers specifically to the river), and is in the template for protected areas of Libya. Most of the information at Cinyps is from antiquity, so it makes sense to keep it there, rather than moving it to the modern name of what seems to be an area of comparatively little importance (at least in modern times). It would also be appropriate to mention that (the area around it?) is protected under modern Libyan law, so there's no problem adding the information there. But that probably could stand to be expanded, and I'm not sure whether the template is meant to link to a river chiefly known from antiquity, as opposed to whatever protections there are for the area in modern times. P Aculeius (talk) 17:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
