Talk:Cine 160
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Are these claims verifiable?
[edit]Have any of the claims proposed by Allan Silliphant been vetted or verified by a reliable third party? Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- That is a very good question. This article was originally split off from the widescreen article, IIRC. Since the information seemed informative and possibly relevant, I figured it was best to give it an article in order to get it off the widescreen article with minimal fuss. I have suspected for some time that this article was spam to drum up support for this proposed system, but due to a mention on in70mm.com (a generally decent resource for odd formats), I decided to let it lie. However, if you'd like to raise the alerts, I'm all for it. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- I am only mildly concerned, but to be honest I'm not sure what steps can or should be taken. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 00:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)