Talk:Cindy Lee Van Dover

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

peer review

1. Completeness:

   500 words per person: no. 147 words
   Lead Paragraph: missing
   4 Sections of content: no, only one
   Minimum ammount of citations: no, only one website 
   Images: none

2. Evaluation of Resources:

   Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority? yes
   Are the sources listed in the References of accurate? yes
   Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while     articles or just easily available articles? the ONE they found is worth while

3. Readability & Content:

   Is the information being presented factual in nature? yes
   Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias)no
   Does the article flow effectively? no, it reads like bullet points when its a paragraph 
   Does the article feeling like it is missing content? yes

Huenemet (talk) 15:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

You are on the right track, but you need to add much more content in order to bring this page up to the expected 500 words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdowell92 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 1. Completeness: o 500 words per person: The person did a minimum of 500 words o Lead Paragraph: Yes o 4 Sections of content: Yes o Minimum amount of citations: The person has not enough citations o Images: 2. Evaluation of Resources: o Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority? Yes o Are the sources listed in the References of accurate? Yes o Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles? As reader, the format you guys used in this secction does not help in your page. 3. Readability & Content: o Is the information being presented factual in nature? Yes o Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias) Awards and Honors: Mark in blue the names of the awards National Science Foundation and William & Alumini Fellowship Award, both are important achivements in Cindy’s career. o Does the article flow effectively? Yes[reply]

Eivelazquez (talk) 03:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at California Maritime Academy supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]