Talk:Cindy Carol

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

PROD

This page was proposed for deletion by Mr. Guye (talk · contribs) on 12 June 2014 with the comment:
Proposing article for deletion per WP:PROD
It was contested by DGG (talk · contribs) on 13 June 2014 with the comment:
considering her role in a Gidget followup... there are probably reviews. Refs Need to be looked for, not the article deleted

Disclosure: I am the creator of this article (but not the contestor of the PROD).

And thanks for the heads-up by the nom [1] which provided a rationale Sole attribution is to IMDb (and IMO Twinkle should have added the rationale to the article edit summary rather than just saying that it was a PROD, and/or placed it on this talk page - I'm not a Twinkle user myself so don't know what options it offers).

Agree totally that it needs more refs, but frankly the PROD was ridiculous... just starring in one cult movie is sufficient notability, surely? Also agree that WP:BLP is relevant, but there's absolutely no threat to the subject posed by this article. It's certainly neither contentious nor libelous or harmful.

I'm a bit surprised and disappointed that the article has not been expanded and refs added, but there you are.

If our policies on WP:PROD or WP:BLP suggest that this article should be deleted, then they need tweaking. But I think a more careful reading of them will produce a clear keep. It's a good stub and needs expansion, exactly as the contestor pointed out. Andrewa (talk) 18:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

Unfortunately the Rotten Tomatoes entries

seem to be based on Wikipedia.

Looking for others. Andrewa (talk) 18:26, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]