Talk:Church of the Holy Mother of God, Donja Kamenica/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email) 10:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments

Only one request: now that you've removed the photos, would you please provide a stable, reliable link (with archived url in the template) to an outside site that has authorized images of the church? You could link to the site where you got the original photos, for example. Lemurbaby (talk) 10:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've included a link to the gallery where I got the photos. How should I incorporate an archived version of that page though? An external link would not use a {{cite}} template so I can't really include it as a parameter on that one :) Best, — Toдor Boжinov — 19:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You could manually type in something like "Archived at Webcite on August 31, 2011" (substituting the actual archive url for the one I provided in the example here), or just use the archive url in place of the original url. Let me know when you come up with something you like. Lemurbaby (talk) 01:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unable to archive the page properly :( It returns some error: [1]. — Toдor Boжinov — 08:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving it a try. I tried as well and encountered the same problem. Some links just won't archive. Well, we did our best. I'm going to give the article a pass as-is. Thanks again for writing on these topics. It's great to see Bulgarian monuments receive attention like this. Lemurbaby (talk) 10:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the patience with this nomination and the excellent review! It was a pleasure working with you :) — Toдor Boжinov — 11:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]