Talk:Church of St George, Kyustendil/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I made a number of minor copy-edits.[1]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I assume good faith for the sources as I have no knowledge of Bulgarian.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I think this covers sufficient detail, given the difficulties in sourcing

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Licencensed and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Short but sweet, I am satisfied that this meets the GA criteria and so I shall list it. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)