Talk:Church of Body Modification

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Body Modification, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Body ModificationWikipedia:WikiProject Body ModificationTemplate:WikiProject Body ModificationBody Modification articles

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move to live

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 18:12, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Joseph5234/Church of Body Modification → Church of Body Modification — I am not autoconfirmed. I will be in 4 days, but this is a current event issue and I feel like it should be made live in case people need the reference. Joseph5234 (talk) 17:25, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving and speedy closing... it's a good topic, and a good start, and it's on both CBS and AP so agree, let's get it into the main article space so others can get working on it too. Andrewa (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Thanks a lot. I appreciate it. Joseph5234 (talk) 21:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3rd party sources

Happy to see this article up. I was going to add it myself later today. That said, I'm quite confident that the Church's own website does not count as a neutral source for citations. A quick Google search yesterday returned a good number of news articles that can be used as references. I will try to dig them up and add them later today. Fyrael (talk) 21:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I e-mailed the Church from their site yesterday with some questions and suggesting to them that they add or edit this article, but I've yet to receive a response. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fyrael (talk • contribs) 21:59, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Church of Body Modification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140311164013/http://uscobm.com/Official to http://uscobm.com/Official

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]