Jump to content

Talk:Chuck Versus the Last Details

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleChuck Versus the Last Details has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 28, 2011Good article nomineeListed

[Untitled]

[edit]

We need spoiler alert in this page

This is not a fan forum, and it is not policy on Wiki to put spoiler warnings on articles covering television or movie plots. Ambaryer (talk) 12:29, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Chuck Versus the Last Details/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 18:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are only a few minor problems, after fixed, article should make GA no problem.

  • 4.099 million viewers, can we round this to 4.1 please, it helps reading (only for the lead, below readers want focus on accuracy).
    •  Done
  • The link to "best man" in the plot, is overkill, should be removed.
    •  Done
  • Can you rephrase the first sentence of the Production section since those exact words have already been used in the lead.
    •  Done
  • Could you subsection the Music and Cultural references under Production, it would look cleaner like that.
    •  Done
  • Again, first sentence of Reception is exactly the same as the lead, it's repetitious and needs to be changed.
    •  Done
  • Is there no less positive review to be found? It seems slightly biased, if there isn't don't sweat it, but if there is one to be found it should be added.
    • I've added the only somewhat negative review I can find from a semi-reliable source, where the reviewer says that the show's "anything that can go wrong will go wrong" pace is "killing [her, the reviewer,] by inches".
  • The References list should be split in 2.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Just needs a few changes here and there, everything is fine in this area.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): (citations to reliable sources): (OR):
    Perfic'
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Needs a review that focuses more on the negative aspects of the episode, if none are to be found, this will be changed to a pass.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Perfic'.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Comments above.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Fantastic stuff! That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 21:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! --Boycool (talk) 21:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chuck Versus the Last Details. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chuck Versus the Last Details. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:41, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chuck_Versus_the_Last_Details&oldid=1199825472"