Talk:Chualar, California

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chualar, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"East of Eden" etymology for Chualar

The etymology "place of *chual*" given in the article is undoubtedly the most common and well-attested one. I was just reading John Steinbeck's East of Eden, though, and in Chapter 2 he writes:

When the Spaniards came they had to give everything they saw a name. [...] We have San Miguel, St. Michael, San Ardo, San Bernardo, San Benito, San Lorenzo, San Carlos, San Francisquito. And then the holidays—Natividad, the Nativity; Nacimiente [sic], the Birth; Soledad, the Solitude. But places were also named from the way the expedition felt at the time: Buena Esperanza, good hope; Buena Vista because the view was beautiful; and Chualar because it was pretty. The descriptive names followed: Paso de los Robles because of the oak trees; Los Laureles for the laurels; Tularcitos because of the reeds in the swamp; and Salinas for the alkali which was white as salt.

All of the names in Steinbeck's list make a certain amount of sense to me, except for Chualar. Does anyone know what Steinbeck might have been thinking? My only guess is that this might have been some kind of inside joke on Steinbeck's part, or a subtle way of indicating the narrator's ignorance/bluster (see also the misspelling of "Nacimiento" and maybe the confident identification of "the Solitude" as a holiday when the Soledad mission was founded in October); but I still wonder if I'm missing some folk-etymological connection between some word that sounds like "chualar" and some Spanish word for "pretty". Any thoughts? --Quuxplusone (talk) 18:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about the etymology, but I do think that this passage from a famous novel is worth citing in the article. Coretheapple (talk) 20:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]