Talk:Chrysochus cobaltinus

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Beetles Mid‑importance

	Insects portal Chrysochus cobaltinus is within the scope of WikiProject Beetles, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to beetles. For more information, visit the project page.BeetlesWikipedia:WikiProject BeetlesTemplate:WikiProject Beetlesbeetle articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chrysochus cobaltinus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100704170402/http://waynesword.palomar.edu/ww0502.htm to http://waynesword.palomar.edu/ww0502.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Behavior

This article describes that these beetles are able to launch themselves a couple times the length of their body but does not detail the mechanism behind this process or what the significance of this behavior is. Additional information should be added. Good that you included group behavior in the spring when large groups feeds on various plants within the same area of distribution. Could add information about whether there are any observed differences in feeding behavior between males and females Hipper2305 (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Overall this was a very cool article, providing the reader with pertinent information regarding the cobalt milkweed beetle. The edits I made involved some simple syntax changes. These changes are meant to standardize the tone across all sections, which were slightly varying in formalness. One thing I would add to this article is additional references. Otherwise, it was very intriguing to learn about such a rare bug.

Sbimal (talk) 03:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2024

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 25 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hahelen (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jaden.l17 (talk) 21:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that C. cobaltinus male beetles remain on the female beetle's back after mating to increase their chance for fatherhood? Source: Dickinson, J. L. (1995). Trade-offs between postcopulatory riding and mate location in the blue milkweed beetle. Behavioral Ecology, 6(3), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/6.3.280
- Reviewed:

5x expanded by Hahelen (talk). Self-nominated at 04:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Chrysochus cobaltinus; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Seems to be 3.5x, from around 5800 to 20,000. AryKun (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- AryKun, the 5x expansion rule applies to prose, not page size. As the article has grown from 379 words to over 2000, it is eligible. Please continue with your review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'll let someone else do the review then. Skimming through, I saw at least a couple paragraphs with no citations, so at least that will have to be dealt with. AryKun (talk) 03:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hahelen:, I'll take this over. There are multiple uncited paragraphs that have been delinquent for some time now. I will fail this if it's not resolved within the next few days. You've had over a month to resolved them and were last notified 20 days ago that these are an issue. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 01:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC) General eligibility:[reply]

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - n
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting: - n
Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: QPQ not necessary. No pics. The hook is clunky and poorly worded (It begs, the question more than giving a snappy factoid) there might be something interesting in there but you're gonna have to reword it or provide an alternative. Spotchecks find the phrase The elytra usually have more or less evident epipleura, which is pushing some close paraphrasing. Earwig is clear. Multiple citations are missing from the prompt.

@Hahelen:, are you active? 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 22:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC) 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 01:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoyed the content of this. There was a lot of important points made about the beetle species. There was a lot of important and helpful information on the mating behaviors of these beetles. I found it very interesting that the male beetle will mount the female beetle and remain stationary for an extended period. I did add some changes. I included a section about the genetics of the beetle and there is genetic differentiation with the blue milkweed based on geographical region. The section also included diet differences between its sister species. Additionally, I added more information in the mating section. This section includes hybridizing between C. cobaltinus and C. auratus and the effects of doing so. The impacts of hybridizing affects each sister species differently, so including that section was important in my opinion. Connectscience0224 (talk 05:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]