Talk:Chrysler Sebring

Avenger

I was wondering. Since a new Dodge Avenger is coming out soon, should the Dodge Avenger have a seperate page? I think it should because not only the fact of its future production, but also the fact that a concept car was produced as well, and the concept car is totally different than the Sebring. --The Helper S

Housekeeping

Just passing through to do some minor housekeeping tasks, and noticed a couple of things. First, I tidie the images that were left-justified, as the text was getting squeezed into a fairly small space between the photos and infoboxes.

Also, isn't this the best-selling convertible in the world? I'm sure I read that somewhere... or at least, it has been in the past. I'd have thought that this was of sufficient note to gain a mention. Here's a source to cite if you need it: "'The old Sebring convertible was the world's best-selling open car' says Chrysler sales and marketing VP Joe Eberhardt, 2006 London Motor Show. --DeLarge 20:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Split off sedan

the sedan should be split off into Chrysler Sebring (sedan) to match the couple and convertible. This page then should be an overview page.

Merge requestes

Response

I have merged all three pages and redirected them enjoy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaaaplay (talk • contribs) 01:37, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mergefrom Chrysler Sebring (coupe)

see Talk:Chrysler Sebring (coupe)

Mergefrom Chrysler Sebring (convertible)

see Talk:Chrysler Sebring (convertible)

Update

Time for an update! Article still displays the 2001-2006 Chrysler Sebring at the top of the page. Come on now, two model years have passed since the current generation (2007-Present) began! Move it along and keep up with the Dodge Avenger page. Crazykrazyqrazy (talk) 18:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is stated that the Sebring /Avenger coupes were based on the Mitsubishi Eclipse . That for a fact is untrue . The chassis / underpinnings and suspension setup is that of the Mitsubishi Galant, Not the Eclipse . The Eagle Talon and is sibling was already direct derivatives of the Eclipse. The Galant platform and chassis was used with front bay architecture of the Galant VR-4 . This was chosen for the main facts that Chrysler wanted a coupe that would not be comparible in length to the already Mitsubishi Eclipse based Eagle Talon .etc. So teh Galants frame/platform was used to make a longer swooping coupe that would be bigger than the Talon . One thing was that that Mitsubishi had initially planned to use the 6G73 coupled to Auto F4A33 transmission , but Chrysler did not and wanted to use a version of their transmission as used previouslly on their vehicles equiped with the 6G72 Mitsubishi 3 liter V6. So the engine bay layout to that of the Galant VR-4 was used to mount the 6G73 2.5 V6 and be capable of using the Chrysler made transmission. Thus the match up was not great as for the Sebring and Avenger V6 had a very high transmission failure rate . The interior cues were also taken from the Galant . The center to trim panel and gauges to a near to identical shifter console layout . The center vents and bolster woodgrain panels are the same part numbers as the Galant , same for the gauges as used in Limited 1994 Galant GS coupled with DOCH and 5 speed manual transmission. The later Sebring Coupe was indeed a derivetive of the Eclipse but not the first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kongkit (talk • contribs) 18:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC) ~~Kongkit~~[reply]

On later Sebring Coupes and other models that utilized the Mitsubishi platform , egronomics and engine layout opted to use Mitsubishi's F4A51 transmission coupled to the larger 24v 6G72 engine to avoid the fiasco of transmission problems that plauged previous models.

~~Kongkit~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kongkit (talk • contribs) 18:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I don't think that coupes should share a page with thee 4dr and convertibles, because other than the name, nothing else is the same. Secondly, yes, they are built on a Galant-ish platform....which is in many ways just a stretched out Eclipse platform. Also, Sebrings (both generations) have much in common with Eclipse/Talons. The vast majority of the interior, minus the center stack/console, headliner and rear seat area, are virtually identical (which color choices often being the only this separating them). A 1995 Eclipse/Talon dash will fit a 95 Sebring, as will the door panels, seats etc. Suspension wise, it is much the same story with many components. Just thought I would mention this Jon the dodgeboy (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update Reminder

Well, it's been 9 months. While millions of babies have been born, not a single Wikipedian updated the Sebring photo. I'd understand if this was a pony car and you displayed a popular model from a various year, but this is the model that aged along with the final version of the Dodge Stratus. Come on, if I don't have a new photo, someone else does. Crazykrazyqrazy (talk) 15:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Sebring pic is European model

Changed the caption for the 2007 Sebring pic. The BUX-style tail-lights (clear lens for amber turn signals) denote a European model. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.43.133.235 (talk) 02:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chrysler bankruptcy

This article contains forward-looking statements speculating about the future of Chrysler Motors. Perhaps it should restrict its bailiwick to statements of the current status of the car manufacturer, and refrain from speculations about the future state of its corporate ownership. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.146.163.28 (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sebring

There was also 2.0L Straight-4 engine available for Sebring LE. Year model was 2002. I know this for sure, because I owned one (R.I.P 107th kilometers). Engine itself was poorly built up and most of them (sold in the Finland) get a delivery to junkyard after 120th kilometers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.27.8.53 (talk) 12:08, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chrysler Sebring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]