Jump to content

Talk:Chrysaora helvola

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

species is no longer recognized by WoRMS

[edit]

i've assumed that this article's been kept due to C. helvola still being recognized as valid by WoRMS despite its doubtful history; however, as of now, this isn't the case as its WoRMS page now lists it as unaccepted and a synonym of C. fuscescens. the only other non-wikimedia taxon identifiers that recognize it as an accepted species are IRMNG, NCBI, open tree, and sealifebase. should this article be kept and simply edited to reflect up-to-date info on it not being an accepted by WoRMS, or should it be deleted/merged with C. fuscescens?Wonderego (talk) 00:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]