Talk:Chromium in glucose metabolism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chromium in glucose metabolism redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted on 12 April 2013 by reviewer J.meija (talk · contribs).

Moving content elsewhere?

The content in the Side effects and toxicity may be of better placement in the Chromium article, Biological role section. But without the in vitro content. David notMD (talk) 10:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content and ref that were based solely on animal studies (mice, rats, fruit flies). Also deleted older (2006 & 2007) reviews and replaced with newer meta-analyses. Deleted safety section, as the examples were case studies. Some content copied into this article from Chromium article, but not attributed in the Edit summary, as I had written the content that was copied from Chromium. David notMD (talk) 11:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest a WP:MERGETEXT with Chromium, Biological role indicated by David notMD 6 years ago. Agree, Smokefoot? I'll take the job. Zefr (talk) 02:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this merger should be done. Two more recent meta-analyses (PMID 33783683 (2022) and PMID 32730903 (2020)) should be considered as refs. And delete the older meta-analyses refs. David notMD (talk) 03:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with merge. Wish we could say something about the amount money being made on Cr supplements. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There wasn't much to actually merge, as the Chromium#Biological role section already discussed it adequately. I did create this small section on history, but felt the rest of the article, particularly the primary research and speculative mechanisms section, was deletable. Zefr (talk) 21:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]