Talk:Christopher C. Rogers

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 25 June 2022 by reviewer Kvng (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

This is a borderline case. [1] is good. [2] is an WP:INTERVIEW. [3] is potentially not WP:INDEPENDENT. Other sources cited lack WP:SIGCOV. I optimistically assume more sources could be found if this goes to WP:AFD. ~Kvng (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for creating this article! Two minor notes: I have removed the two statements that cited IMDb, as IMDb is not a reliable source. Additionally, per the second bullet point in MOS:LINKSTYLE, section headers should not themselves be wikilinked, instead, a {{main article}} should be placed directly after the section header. Other than those two small things, the article looks great!.

House Blaster^talk 19:07, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseBlaster, thank you for improving the article. Are you suggesting that these sorts of issues need to be addressed by the original authors or as articles pass through NPP or AFC? ~Kvng (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kvng: For IMDb, I would say that it is the responsibility of both the original author and the reviewer, given it is an unreliable source and this is a BLP. As for MOS:LINKSTYLE, it is a minor issue and not really the "responsibility" of anyone. I just happened to see it and decided to volunteer to WP:JUSTFIXIT. After I made those changes, I figured I would use the built-in feedback option to deliver a quick message to the author just to let them know what I had changed, as a no-fault FYI. House Blaster^talk 22:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseBlaster, it is generally appreciated that when you assign responsibility to two people, a common outcome is that neither takes responsibility. ~Kvng (talk) 14:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kvng: I would say it is akin to copyvios. It is the job of a reviewer to check for copyvios, and to fix them if they exist. However, just because a reviewer is responsible for checking does not mean the original author can completely ignore copyright concerns. I apply the same line of thinking to BLP issues. House Blaster^talk 00:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]