Talk:Christoph Waltz/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 10:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article is now on hold. Thanks! ★★Retro Lord ★★ 11:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As there has been no action on the comments the article has been failed. Please renominate once you have addressed them. ★★Retro Lord ★★ 22:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	I'm a bit worried that the article goes into nowhere near enough depth regarding his personal life, or his acting career wit the exception of Django and playing Hans Landa. Even 80% of the lead seems dedicated to just these two films. Please address this.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	"One of his sons is an Orthodox Jew studying in a Yeshiva in Israel (Waltz's first wife was Jewish)" I dont see how this is relevant? The article goes into no detail regarding his other sons, and the only detail provided on this son is what he is stuying. Seems like it is being used to push a POV, but ill look into it further
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.