Jump to content

Talk:Christmas Queens 2/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

We had discussed the prospect of me potentially reviewing one of your articles this winter in the past; I will now do it! --K. Peake 17:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • "and a tour with December shows" → "and a tour by various artists with December 2016 shows"
  • Why are the countries not ordered alphabetically?
  • You should add a sentence after this one about the album's critical reception, writing: "Christmas Queens 2 received..."
    • I just added "received a mixed critical reception" ahead and the chart placement claim because there aren't really overarching opinions, I would say. Critics more or less said things they liked and didn't like about individual performers, more than provide commentary on the album as a whole. Would you agree? ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

[edit]

Release and promotion

[edit]

Tour and live performances

[edit]

Reception and chart history

[edit]

Track listing

[edit]

Charts

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Copyvio score is too high at 58,6%; fix quoting from the refs to reduce this
    • Hmmm, the only extended quotes are the two in the "Reception" section, which I'm reluctant to trim because they are the best commentary about the album as a whole as opposed to individual performances. Is trimming required if the quotes are appropriately attributed, given proper weight, and otherwise integrated nicely within the article overall? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments and verdict

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.