Jump to content

Talk:Christina Aguilera/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) 13:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this a go. Please bear in mind I have a bit of a busy life, and the reason I want to GA review this is because I'd like to learn more about the article's subject as I go. So the review may take a while. Generally, I will list issues as I find them, and let you know when I've swept the whole article.

  • I see this is the second GA review, but the first was over four years ago and was failed due to the problems not being fixed in time, so I don't see that as being an issue for this one.
  • The article is very long. I see you've done some cleanup and removing things, but even so there's an awful lot to get through. While for a popular culture topic, I think large articles are less of an issue, I want to make sure that we're not just staring at a lot of unnecessary puffery.
  • There are a lot of references in the lead. Generally, the lead should summarise what else is in the article, so if you have information here that has to be backed up by references, it probably wants reworking.
 Done
As you probably noticed, DeadSend4 (talk · contribs) has disagreed with this and reverted the edits, so I have invited him on here to expand on his reasons. There's no firm policy one way or the other about what sources need to go in the lead, but anything that's not really contentious and is mentioned again with sources in the main article is acceptable not to be cited again in the lead. I think just citing sales figures in the lead is probably okay, but I'm going to come back to this.

More later! --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The reference to domestic violence is a dead link. Per WP:BLP this must be resourced or removed immediately. I cannot pass an article as GA with outstanding BLP issues.
 Done
  • "Since then, her mother has married a paramedic named Jim Kearns" - the reference for this is insufficient, it should be either a web link or have an ISBN number so verification is unambiguous. I'm not sure this sentence is particularly relevant - best leave it out, I think.
 Done
 Done
It has been used in several articles I've seen so not sure why it's not reliable in this article. DeadSend4 (talk) 02:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The information about which schools she attended is not sourced. The nearest source is the Pittsburgh Tribune Review which mentions her appearance at sports events, but nothing else.
  • The incident about slashing tires is cited to a gossip magazine. WP:BLPSOURCES states that "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism.". Contentious information (which this is) should be cited to multiple sources where possible.
This shouldn't be in issue, yes US Magazine does have some type of tabloid stories but I don't see how this is any different than People magazine. Christina herself has been on the cover and has given numerous interviews with this magazine. Nothing here should be changed. DeadSend4 (talk) 02:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is an Ananova reference which appears to be a dead link, and is not formatted correctly per the {{cite news}} template guidelines.
 Done
This has since been removed DeadSend4 (talk) 02:42, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So far, I'm afraid this doesn't look good - there are a number of BLP issues that need to resolved quickly. I'll keep going with the rest of the article, though. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reference to "I'm OK" and "Oh Mother" being about her childhood needs to be sourced, otherwise it's original research
 Done
  • The Golden Stag Festival reference also says "she did not get the audience or the jury's attention". This might be worth including as a quote.
Why would that be neccessary?
This has since been removed
 Done
Removed link about Lilith Fair
 Done
  • The chart position of "Reflection" needs a source
 Done
  • Take out "It [her debut album] was well received by critics" - this is original research as the article only has a single review after it. Better to just leave what the review said.
 Done
 Done
 Done
  • The RIAA reference, used to verify the debut album's appearance in their "Top 100 Albums of All Time" list, doesn't appear to work
 Done
  • Her debut single, "Genie in a Bottle", topped the Billboard Hot 100 and several countries worldwide. The chart position in the US only implicitly referenced in the nearby Billboard reference, and there is no citation given for any chart positions anywhere else.
Shouldn't this be a given that the single was succesful, if so then we're going to have to source every country? Wouldn't the wikilink provide all that additional information? Not sure why this is necessary. DeadSend4 (talk) 03:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • None of "She made a cameo appearance on an episode of Beverly Hills, 90210" through "accompanied only by a piano" is sourced.
 Done

--Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:50, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll fix the other issues tomorrow... check if everything is ok. 11Jorn Time goes by so slowly 22:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thanks. I'm taking a break until tomorrow evening (had enough trawling through people.com references for one evening!) As long as somebody's on top of these issues, we'll hopefully make progress and improve the article. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. I'm also looking for what I could do for the cleanup. 11Jorn Time goes by so slowly 22:55, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Made a couple additional corrections. 68DANNY2 (talk) 20:56, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a quick chat with DeadSend4 here and he's under the impression you've just been deleting information from the article where I've identified problems. I personally haven't had a chance to check yet, but the trouble is, if you do that, you'll remove vital information that keeps the balance, whereas you might just need to find an alternative source or reword stuff instead. Let me know if that's an issue. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

4th December

[edit]

Issues for today.

  • The Yahoo Music story about the 2000 grammys doesn't mention anything about her being nominated for Best Female Pop Vocal Performance, only for winning Best New Artist. Easiest thing to do here I think is to remove the reference to that nomination and focus on the win, also mentioning (which the source does) at her surprise at receiving it.
 Done
  • There was some debate about whether or not Mi Reflejo could generally be considered her second studio album. Has this been resolved?
 Done
This is her second studio album and from what I've been told (since I consider Stripped a sophmore album) it's her second album no matter if it's English or Spanish. Again this is what I was told years ago and have been specifically told it should not be changed.DeadSend4 (talk) 00:57, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The two MTV references citing Mi Reflejo both date from when it was a work in progress. Therefore they cannot verify its chart positions and sales figures
Those MTV links were before the sentence that lists her sales and figures so that wouldn't be relevant. Regardless, I found multiple sources and added them into the article
 Done
  • The People Source, that attempts to cite information about her Christmas album in 2000, only goes back to 2002.
 Done
Someone else has done it.
 Done removed.
  • [RIAA RIAA Gold and Platinum certifications This RIAA source] is used to cite My Reflection going gold, but doesn't appear to contain any data. The dates for the tour also need a citation.
 Done
  • The paragraph about Aguilera's relationships and feud with Eminem can probably move to a "Personal life" section elsewhere
 Done removed
  • This source cites Aguilera dating Carson Daley but is a dead link. In my opinion, this is a contentious statement, which violates WP:BLP and must therefore be fixed ASAP.
 Done removed
  • "[Nobody Wants To Be Lonely] reached number one on the World Chart and top ten in several countries" is not cited
 Done
  • Hurrah - something I recognise (my non-notable covers band plays this) - This source is used to cite the chart position of Lady Marmalade but only seems to confirm its existence on the Moulin Rouge soundtrack
 Done removed
  • The comparison to Dee Snider I suspect is mildly disparaging. Not being American, I don't know if USA Today counts as a tabloid source and fails WP:BLPSOURCES. I'd leave this out.
 Done removed
  • Regarding to Aguilera saying ""I guess the big hair paid off." - the source mentions this was in jest. Don't know if that's worth mentioning though.
 Done removed
  • I don't suppose we could find a link for the Toronto Sun reference that cites the damage settlement from Warlock Records regarding Just Be Free
 Done

--Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

5 December

[edit]
  • I'm not sure where exactly in this source is citing the intention for Stripped to have more musical and lyrical depth
 Done
  • The October 2000 fiduciary duty lawsuit is not cited
 Done
 Done
 Done
The second paragraph to this paragraph clearly states Aguilera recieved negative press for her image change, so it is already noted. DeadSend4 (talk) 07:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • This source is supposed to cite the quote "I'm also at the forefront. I'm in the power position, in complete command of everything around me", but doesn't
Actually it does, you just didn't bother to read the entire article. So no changes will be made here DeadSend4 (talk) 05:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done
 Done
 Done removed
  • The overhead lighting grid incident is not sighted
 Done
  • Which source is citing the quote "we had fun working with certain clothes, or the lack thereof."?
 Done It's there, corrected the link to make the quote accesible, but it is in this article DeadSend4 (talk) 08:14, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The mid 2004 tour is not cited to any source
 Done
  • "The change [to a Marilyn Monroe influenced image] was met with a positive response" is only cited to a single source - Elle magazine. To cite a trend, you probably want multiple sources; for a single source, refer it to the specific publication
 Done removed

Potential quickfail due to stability

[edit]

Guys,

This article is changing all the time, people are reverting stuff back and forth, and there's no real consensus on content. I don't think this is ready for GA, to be honest. I'm going to request a second opinion on the GA noticeboard, but for now can everyone just hold off changing things until I've finished running down the article. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I really think it was nominated by a user who didn't know the criteria. And I agree it is changing, people reverting edits, etc. I hope it meets the criteria in the future for a new GA nomination. 11Jorn Time goes by so slowly 23:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, following this discussion I concur. It certainly has the potential to be a good article in the long term future, but I think there's just too much going on the article for it to settle down into a stable state. Hopefully once all the dead links and sourcing has been checked over, we can revisit this in the new year. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:11, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Christina_Aguilera/GA2&oldid=1082468763"