Talk:Christians for Biblical Equality

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:CBE Logo.gif

Image:CBE Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links

I've removed the link to cbmw.org from the external links and it was placed back since it's an opposing view. Opposing views are already linked in "See also." The link section is for links concerning what the article is about, not advertising for other groups. Basileias (talk) 03:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Christians for Biblical Equality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614124421/http://www.cbeinternational.org/?q=content%2Four-mission-and-history to http://www.cbeinternational.org/?q=content%2Four-mission-and-history
Corrected formatting/usage for http://cbmw.org/uncategorized/personal-reflections-on-the-history-of-cbmw-and-the-state-of-the-gender-debate/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christians for Biblical Equality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110112103529/http://www.christianethicstoday.com/cetart/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.main&ArtID=505 to http://christianethicstoday.com/cetart/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.main&ArtID=505

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sources

By my count, 12 of the 17 footnotes cite primary sources. Nine of those 12 cite the CBE's own website. Other parts of the article have no sources. This seems like a problem. Amandil21 (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect claim regarding understanding of "headship" in marriage

I've removed the following unsourced sentence from the lede:

"They also believe that headship in marriages are for the older spouse and not for husbands alone."

There is nothing in CBE or other egalitarian doctrinal understanding that associates marital "headship" with whoever is older. Rather, egalitarian interpretation contends that the use of the Greek term for "head" (kephale) does not connote or imply leadership or authority over (as "head" does in English and "rosh" in Hebrew), but is rather (in the metaphorical uses in question) about unity (head-body metaphor) and source (as in the term "headwaters").

Also, acknowledging that the article needs better sourcing, but as said sentence demonstrates, there's often a lot of misinformation floating around for positions of interpretational-issue-focused groups like this outside of their own sites and materials, so it can be hard to find usable, accurate secondary sources... John Darrow (talk) 06:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]