Talk:Christian Embassy
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a talk page for discussion of the article about Christian Embassy. It is not for discussion about the organization itself, unless that discussion involves improving the article. In particular, it is not for discussion about whether or not Christian Embassy is a "good" or "bad" organization; or advocating a particular political position or view on theology or spirituality. Please see "Wikipedia is not a soapbox" and "Wikiquette" for information about the proper use of talk pages. |
Before asking a question here concerning what can and cannot be posted in this article, please refer to the following Wikipedia rules:
|
Current Discussion Topics
[edit]Use the space below to start or join a current discussion. If you want to start a new dialogue, be sure to check out the archives to see what has previously been discussed. Thanks for participating and helping to make wikipedia an excellent online resource. --Sixtrojans 23:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Discussion of Pentagon Promo Video & Media Concerns of Evangelical Influence in Washington D.C.
[edit]I moved the "controversy" section of the Christian Embassy article to the talk page for editing. It does not represent a neutral point of view, contains many weasel words and none of it sourced even though there are plenty of articles about it online. Please help us clean up this section for re-inclusion in the article. --Sixtrojans 23:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Original Section: Controversy
[edit]Please do not edit this portion--use as reference only
Since a central tenet of evangelical Christianity is a vigorous effort to convert non-evangelicals, critics of the Christian Embassy charge[citation needed] that its mission statement describes an effort to abet public servants in proseletyzing in the workplace. The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States probits the "establishment of religion" by the Federal government. The judgments of US courts have interpreted the First Amendment to mean that the use of government resources for the purpose of advancing a religion violates a founding principle of our society.[citation needed]
The efforts implied by the Christian Embassy's mission statement would use public office (and therefore public funds and public personnel) in the service of religious advancement. Because of this, critics see Christian Embassy's efforts to be in violation of the First Amendment.[citation needed]
CNN recently broke a story about a highly controversial Christian Embassy promotional video. The video depicted government personnel creating promotional materials for the religious organization while in uniform. Some of the video was actually filmed in the Pentagon.[citation needed]
Proposed Section: Controversy
[edit]Edit new version here
Since a central tenet of evangelical Christianity is a vigorous effort to convert non-evangelicals, critics of the Christian Embassy charge[citation needed] that its mission statement describes an effort to abet public servants in proseletyzing in the workplace. The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States probits the "establishment of religion" by the Federal government. The judgments of US courts have interpreted the First Amendment to mean that the use of government resources for the purpose of advancing a religion violates a founding principle of our society.[citation needed]
The efforts implied by the Christian Embassy's mission statement would use public office (and therefore public funds and public personnel) in the service of religious advancement. Because of this, critics see Christian Embassy's efforts to be in violation of the First Amendment.[citation needed]
CNN recently broke a story about a highly controversial Christian Embassy promotional video. The video depicted government personnel creating promotional materials for the religious organization while in uniform. Some of the video was actually filmed in the Pentagon.[citation needed]
Discussion of Controversy Section Here
[edit]Use this section for discussing changes
My fault. I had the references lined up, got called onto something else and forgot to finish this. I won't be free to do this for a few weeks, but if anyone else wants to follow up, here are the sources I used (beside their site):
WP article on the Pentagon controversy: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/10/AR2006121000883.html
Harper's article, discusses fundamentalism, evangelicalism and their affect on government, military - notes the video near the end: http://www.harpers.org/ThroughAGlassDarkly-12838838.html
More detailed information on Christian Embassy: http://www.therevealer.org/archives/timely_002761.php
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Christian Embassy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150512040748/http://www.glgeneva.org:80/ to http://www.glgeneva.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Stub-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class Evangelical Christianity articles
- Mid-importance Evangelical Christianity articles
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Start-Class organization articles
- Unknown-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles