Talk:Christ's Commission Fellowship

	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Start‑class Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Relevance of the section on Bin Laden costume controversy?

The topic and its attached section seem pretty irrelevant in the article and sound more like an entry for a gossip column than anything else. It seems much more appropriate to record the church getting involved in an embezzling controversy than to record their annual staff costume party. Can we remove this from Wikipedia and keep the article neat and on-topic?

-124.83.16.28 (talk) 00:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While it might seem rather like a gossip column, it does seem to fit the title of controversy. It's just nice that CCF helped it to get notability by issuing a statement. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

updating references

I am in the process of updating the references for this church. Nice to note, people in this church have very good relations with their employees. Ref: http://www.scribd.com/doc/8986409/HR-Analyses (Bicolexpress (talk) 05:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

added more references (Madapakar (talk) 17:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Ship of fools should not be a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.4.178.94 (talk) 20:19, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last I learned there are now newly-opened churches in Makati City and Antipolo City. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.52.208.222 (talk) 22:56, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And thousands of house churches particularly in India and China. Straight from the pulpit but you can verify with their staff. I appreciate how this article is scholastic and neat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.204.172.70 (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, all! Kudos on the article though with the new additions it will need polishing and sophistication. I noticed that several ministries are not included. I also noticed that the Global Leadership Center is not mentioned. If I remember right that is the equipping or training arm of CCF. Given something of that importance, it should be mentioned at least at the bottom. Thoughts?

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]