Talk:Chrishell Stause

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

United States: Kentucky Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jmcknight08.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: EricAJB.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Why was the picture of Chrishell Strause changed? I liked the other one it was bigger and prettier than this one.

Picture....

To answer your question.... Because the other picture was a professional one taken by a photographer. Read Wikipedia's picture policy, please. When posting pictures, try to use screencaps.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chrishell Stause. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080328041826/http://www.papermag.com/blogs/2007/06/curtain_cutie_matthew_morrison.php to http://www.papermag.com/blogs/2007/06/curtain_cutie_matthew_morrison.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Was she born in Missouri or Kentucky?

Born entries conflict 2603:7081:3842:B480:BD8A:7BA5:B4A:C3D6 (talk) 18:08, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People magazine reliability

@Nick Levine: I see that you recently added a comment to this article that says “People” magazine is not a reliable source. I didn't know that was true -- and I don't see anything at the People (magazine) article that discusses reliability or reputation. You linked to WP:BLPRS, so I guess your claim is that People is tabloid journalism? But again, "tabloid" doesn't appear in the magazines article at all. I'm just wondering what the basis for your claim is, since I'm not sure what sources have been established by Wikipedia as categorically unreliable. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taken to BLP noticeboard for advice, because I’m a little unsure of my ground. Nick Levine (talk) 22:11, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard response is that People is a reliable source for this. See WP:RSP.
Part of my caution here stems from a number of pieces which a Google search will find for you, stating that the couple exchanged vows etc. but did not make marriage “legal” because they did not sign the register. If that is true, are they actually married? Oh well, not for us to conduct WP:OR.
I see marriage is back in the article now. I won’t dispute it.

Nick Levine (talk) 06:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into it! I don't (didn't) know if the magazine was considered unreliable, either. The thing that I think is odd is that it seems to be the only source for this news just now, and that itself doesn't seem particularly compelling. (Oh, and thanks for the link to WP:RSP. That's exactly what I was hoping to find!) -- Mikeblas (talk) 04:11, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially misleading statement?

I was surprised to see that Stause was "a member of improvisational troupe The Groundlings in Los Angeles". I wanted to know more so I checked the source (source 8, a TVLine article from 12/5/2011). There she says that she "just wrapped up classes at The Groundlings". I don't think that's the same thing as being a member of The Groundlings, but I'm not an expert. Is this something that can be verified? Am I even posting in the right place? Does it even matter? Lol Jester424 (talk) 22:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]