Jump to content

Talk:Chris Van Allsburg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Picture

[edit]

I am not positive how to post a picture. But i would appreciate if someone could add a picture to this article

Thanks!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.210.239.2 (talkcontribs) 10:03, November 17, 2006

File:VanAllsburg200.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:VanAllsburg200.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:06, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LC online catalog records

[edit]

The list of Works is complete with respect to the Library of Congress Online Catalog (see Ext links), if i clerk correctly and we do not count derivative works.

LCCat records cover five more titles. These are books published by Houghton Mifflin in 2004, derivative of the Polar Express book or movie. The first four seem to be standard picture books (unpaged or 31/32pp).

I am not familiar with the spin-off book business, nor with its treatment here.

The article now refers to two LCCat records. The Mysteries of Harris Burdick may be another of sufficient interest.

Summary: "Presents a series of loosely related drawings each accompanied by a title and a caption which the reader may use to make up his or her own story." The first-listed LCSH is "Plot-your-own stories picture book".

--P64 (talk) 23:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


i expect to annotate some, delete some, use some in the article --some time after this interruption --P64 (talk) 21:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Van Allsburg and his "older sister" were both born in 1949, according to this article.

[edit]

Chris Van Allsburg and his "older sister" were both born in 1949, according to this article.Dfrankchat (talk) 16:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The specific information about Karen (his sister) is irrelevant for inclusion in this BLP "He has a sister named Karen, born in 1947." WP:BLP,WP:IRIWritethisway (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Original research?

[edit]

This is the last paragraph / sentence of the article: "Van Allsburg's drawings are particularly notable for their use of perspective. In many cases the illustrations are drawn from a child's eye height. This viewpoint likely appeals to children because it conveys the world as they see it. It may also appeal to adults because they may (unconsciously) perceive the world as they did when they were children.[citation needed]"

I have to call you on this. Without a source, the statement smacks of original research. Red flags: "notable" by whom?; "likely"; "may also appeal"; "unconsciously". Lots of illustrators and fine artists utilize perspective, even from the viewpoint of children and small animals. You'd do just as well stating that the appeal of Van Allsburg's artwork is that he's a master at it. Still unsourced, but obvious. Seriously, though, sorce or delete.

As a matter of fact, there are no citations at all in that whole section. Tagged. Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 07:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Van Allsburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Van Allsburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]