Talk:Chris Rogers (journalist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Discussion at BLPN

There is currently a discussion about edits to this article at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Chris Rogers. Dmcq (talk) 14:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is now archived at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive155#Chris_Rogers. --Boson (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding this article

I took quite some time to edit this article to what I believed were the highest Wiki standards of neutrality (the page had asked for the article to be expanded). I was surprised and disappointed to find the whole thing quickly taken down, reverting to a very limited previous version. As a relatively inexperienced Wiki editor I am sure some things can be improved upon, but cannot understand why it all disappeared when it comprised so many straght facts. I would welcome advice on how we move forward on this. Laurencebaskind (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree Laurence. This attempt to re-edit and then masquerade as if it hasn't been edited back to the original is a beguiled attempt to assert a position which is, to put it mildly, flawed. At its lowest it is tantamount to pretending a position of accuracy when in fact it is false of course the perpetrator would not always readily accept this because the self delusion is somewhat ingrained, however those astute to the situation who generally include individuals who can question are alert to fanciful positions - Will look into it 109.154.149.122 (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Investigative journalist since when?

There's a lot of differences of opinion as to what makes up an investigative journalist and what makes a news reporter or rhetorical journalist, the usual high ranking serious investigative journos like Seymour Hersh, John Pilger, Greg Palast.... but a few trips to Africa or Southall doesn't automatically qualify for a title to be compared with the above. No offense to the writer, but the article looks like an advert 109.154.149.122 (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chris Rogers (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]