Talk:Chris Neal (screen composer)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Chris Neal (screen composer) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

The Green Candle (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
JosephM1998 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.
Seen77 (talk · contribs) This user has not edited the article. This user has declared a connection.

Conflict of interest, original research, promotional editing.

Wikipedia is not a free PR platform. This promotion piece was largely supplied by the subject (original research) and edited into the article with a editor with a declared conflict of interest, they are working with the subject to get it looking like said subject wants it to be. See [1] "Added a lot of history, provided to me by Chris himself. We are working on sorting out references and citations", [2] "Chris himself asked me to remove the table." This editor themselves removed the COI tag, along with the BLP sources tag, falsely claiming to have "fixed the issue" [3]. Another single purpose account has also removed them despite clearly have a connection and adding zero reliable sources [4]. Seen77 claiming to be the subject writes "I am basically happy with the page - most of the information has been copied from my own website" [5]. No, that's not how Wikipedia works. It is not a vanity publishing site, it is not here to provide a platform for subjects to promote their preferred view of themselves. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What would it take to have these tags removed? Do you want more citations leading to reliable information, or what? Your concerns make sense, but I'm not seeing a real attempt to find a solution here. Sticking big tags on pages is great and all - but what's the solution? JosephM1998 (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please Delete

{{adminhelp}}

I would like to see this article deleted please. The article is more about the COI templates than it is about providing information. I am accused of using the platform for free PR, but this is not true, I have no such wish. The information contained in the article is available elsewhere on the web and the article is rated low on the Wikipedia scale of value, so I see no reason why it cannot simply be deleted. With thanks. Seen77 (talk) 05:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]