Talk:Chris Jones (drama critic)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 23 January 2016 by reviewer LaMona (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Edit needed to lead

The lead has peacocky language, but I couldn't think of a good way to fix it. The two references are good ones and shouldn't be lost, but the praise has to be softened or removed. LaMona (talk) 14:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I drafted this page (under the username brotherTproductions, which had problems and got blocked - I think I chose the name poorly). My new username is WinterOMeara. I have tried to fix the neutrality issues in the lead section and also all the "citation needed" comments. Have I fixed the problems? If I have, will the box at the top and the notes about citations end up being removed? Thanks!

WinterOMeara (talk) 16:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)WinterOMeara, 25 January 2016[reply]

Yes, it's better. There are still areas that show that cites are needed - if you've added cites there you can remove those. It's ok to remove the "peacock" tag as well. Thanks for editing WP! I hope you stick around to do more. LaMona (talk) 17:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! How do I remove the "citation needed" notations? I've added the correct citations but don't know how to remove the tags. (Sorry to have all these questions - I'm new at this!)

WinterOMeara (talk) 22:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind - I think I figured it out. Hopefully I did it correctly. The banner is still on the page but I removed the peacock tag and the citations needed tags. Thanks.

WinterOMeara (talk) 22:33, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Jones (drama critic). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160126095954/http://www.tcg.org/publications/at/nov11/critical_juncture.cfm to http://www.tcg.org/publications/at/nov11/critical_juncture.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]