Jump to content

Talk:Chris Campoli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

image

[edit]

Just curious why the newer image with the Senators was replaced with the older image with the Islanders. It seems to me that the newer image is more appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freshfighter9 (talkcontribs)

Looks like the user who changed the image have uploaded a couple of copyrighted images, I guess that was the case with this one too since it has been deleted. —Krm500 (Communicate!) 03:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Turnover

[edit]

Because there is dispute about including it, I was hoping if users could give any input about whether his turnover that led to a goal in game seven should be included? Truthsort (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It absolutely should not. It manifestly does not pass WP:Notability for sporting events.Dimaspivak (talk) 14:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That has nothing to do with WP:Notability. WP:Notability is whether or not a person is notable enough to have an article. Truthsort (talk) 19:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Read section 5.2, bud. A bad pass in a first round playoff game does not a notable event make. Dimaspivak (talk) 21:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That has to do with whether or not events are notable for their own article. Truthsort (talk) 07:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Notability aside I disagree with it's inclusion in the article. This is not a situation like Steve Smith where his clearing attempt went off his goaltender and into his own net, Burrows had to pick the puck out of the air and then beat Crawford with a shot. The turnover is just a small part of the entire play not the defining moment. It's also a bit of recentness in 5 years time is this really going to be remembered as Campoli's give away or Burrows goal? Is there media coverage of this turnover being the defining moment of the series or the critical mistake that cost the game, or is it just fan opinion? Also since the article is not overly detailed mentioning one play adds undue weight on a single play from his career, had this been a very detailed article a case might be made for its inclusion.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Campoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]