Talk:Chocolate Swim
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed deletion
[edit]This article is a companion with all the Adult Swim music releases through Williams Street Records, so the main reason I've created all of these "Swim" albums are somewhat for ascetic reasons and I would hate to have one of the albums removed. But all of that aside, this IS a legitimate album with notable rap artists who are praised in their grime/indie style of hip hop and have a cult following. All of these rap artists even have their on wikipedia page, so I don't see how this EP/compilation isn't notable. So please re consider. Davidravenski (talk) 18:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- The album has clearly been written about by various sources. Saying it is not notable is simply false. User:Shadowjams does not do due diligence when marking something as not notable. Fresheneesz (talk) 05:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chocolate Swim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120702120324/http://www.chocolateindustries.com/news/adultswim.php to http://www.chocolateindustries.com/news/adultswim.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)