Talk:Chocolate-covered fruit
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chocolate-covered fruit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]this should either be an article or a list, not a DAB page.
Merge
[edit]I think Chocolate-covered prune, Chocolate-covered raisin and Chocolate-covered cherry would be best served (pun intended) merrged here. They all have borderline, if any, notability, but merged together would be fine, and the article would be more informative. Thoughts? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support merging Chocolate-covered prune and Chocolate-covered raisin. However, oppose merging Chocolate-covered cherry, which is independently notable. I have added more sources to the latter article that demonstrate notability. North America1000 15:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, for God's sake, leave it be. There is lots of c-covered shit, no sense to fight them. Nearly all of them have borderline notability (semi-expert refs may be readily found in various foodie sources) and potentially merged into one big page List of chocolate-covered foods, but wikipedia is not paper. Also, these are generic products, i.e., not promo-adverts for particular products. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Closing, given the lack of consensus for any merge reason and stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 04:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)