Talk:Chirograph

Christianity: Texts / Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (assessed as Low-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Sorry, but this article is silly

The use to which the word "chirograph" is put is much broader than a specific type of papal document. A dictionary definition of the word gives it as 'A writing which, requiring a counterpart, was engrossed twice on the same piece of parchment, with a space between, in which was written the word chirographum, through which the parchment was cut, and one part given to each party.' This is the only use to which I personally have seen the word put hitherto. The idea of cutting the duplicate document in two was a practical one - each copy could be proven genuine by being brought together with its counterpart. A decidedly non-papal example is here. I'll have a rummage and see if I can't find some stuff on which to base a partial, stop-gap re-write. Nortonius (talk) 18:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a minimal edit per my previous comment. Nortonius (talk) 03:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

Etymology "chirograph" gr. cheirógraphos (χειρόγραφος) 'manuscript' 'handwritten'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pilot Pirx (talk • contribs) 20:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sisters Of Perpetual Indulgence

I'm sure this is vandalism, but it's been in the page so long that I'm not able to find what it previously said. Not sure what should go in here, so I'm going to flag the page with needs expert somehow Anniepoo (talk) 23:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]