This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Chirgilchin is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music articles
Excuse me for any ignorance on my part as this is the first time I'm seeing copyvio in action. I guess I don't understand why you just don't start a new article from scratch instead of tagging this with the copyvio template and requesting that no one edit the page to fix the problem. Especially in this case, I just don't see any sort of reversion war going on that would require anyone to lock the article in such a manner and request any sort of review from the larger community. How long are we not supposed to edit the article for? It seems trivial enough to create a new page from scratch using the facts presented in the original even if you didn't know anything about the subject. --Stacey Doljack Borsody14:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The original article was a 100% cut and pasted from a copyrighted source, so I followed protocol. I was going to suggest you create Chirgilchin/Temp, but I see you already have. If you would like to be bold and replace the copyvioed text (and warning) with your own article, I will certainly not object. Thanks!Econrad03:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]