Talk:Chiral media

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chiral media article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

‹See TfM›

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering High‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minor edits

For this article I fixed reference / citation #2 by adding the same reference used over at Metamaterial for this material.) Also, I added relevant categories and wiki project templates. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 20:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Referenced text is wrong with regards to handedness

The reference cited http://books.google.com/books?id=OqRi4s_EskoC&pg=PA6#v=onepage&q=&f=false
is in fact wrong with regards to wave propagation and handedness. Although the article is correct.

Here is a screen shot of the relevant page in the quoted book.
http://i575.photobucket.com/albums/ss192/dave2346/Handedness%20Dont%20Delete/MetamaterialsandPlasmonics14-1.jpg

The statement is simply false refer to Talk:Polarizer/Lengthy_quotes#Federal Standard 1037C

Here is the image referred to in the text http://i575.photobucket.com/albums/ss192/dave2346/Handedness%20Dont%20Delete/MetamaterialsandPlasmonics15.jpg

The caption in the image contradicts his earlier statement that he is using the Federal Standard. The Federal Standard states that the handedness of the helix matches the defined handedness of polarization.

In my opinion the link to this book, at least with regards to chirality in electromagnetism, should be removed for it is only feeding the level of confusion surrounding this issue.

I have replaced the reference with one that agrees with the text of the article. Which is Talk:Polarizer/Lengthy_quotes#HANDBOOK OPTICS Volume I,Ch5 section 6 footnote
I appreciate that it does not deal with chirality and molecules but at least it is not misleading.

Also go to circular polarization#left/right for a section that is referenced and discusses the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave3457 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chirality (electromagnetism). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100504144713/http://www.ameslab.gov/final/News/2009rel/Casimir.html to http://www.ameslab.gov/final/News/2009rel/Casimir.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No discussion kept about electromagnetic fields other than waves.

Everything about interaction of electricity and magnetism (other-than electromagnetic wave) , is clear-cut chiral. So, it requires a discussion to improve this article. In addition, the relation of electric-current and magnetic field , Fleming's left-hand rule for motors and Fleming's right-hand rule (for generators) are exactly 2 opposite (mirror-image like) situations. It should be mentioned.

As well as charged-particle deflection path in magnetic field is chiral.

So, this should also be discussed under this heading of Chirality(Electromagnetism)

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chirality (electromagnetism). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5x7CwBtjf?url=http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/fs-1037/ to http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/fs-1037/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chirality (electromagnetism). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527085553/http://www.ameslab.gov/final/News/Releases.htm to http://www.ameslab.gov/final/News/Releases.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]