Talk:Chipewyan language

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Velar" fricatives

I just followed the link to the Saskatchewan Indian Cultural Centre. It leads to sound files. I'm a native speaker of southeastern German, which has a voiceless velar fricative; speakers of Alemannic dialects (Switzerland, Vorarlberg) use a uvular one instead, which is very distinctive. Thus, I trust my judgment that the "Dene" sound files marked hh and gh record uvular rather than velar fricatives.

(And then I'll have to contact the webmaster of that site. There is no gh in German, and very few German dialects have a voiced velar fricative, let alone a uvular one.) David Marjanović 22:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

Why was this page moved from "Chipewyan language" (which is the commonly used name) to "Dene Suline language" (which is just the proper name in the language itself, bereft of all diacritics). Is there a valid reason? If there isn't. I'd suggest moving it back to the name everyone is using. — N-true (talk) 21:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved it back. At the least, if we're going to move it, we should also move Chipewyan people. — kwami (talk) 21:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But, the name "Chippewyan" is a pejorative name. --Kmoksy (talk) 14:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chipewyan language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chipewyan language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120212123739/http://www.pagc.sk.ca/pagc.asp?ID=3 to http://www.pagc.sk.ca/pagc.asp?ID=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chipewyan language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:40, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

It seems that it’s "Dënësųłınë́", not *"Dënesųłiné". See sign. Tuvalkin (talk) 11:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I write it as denesųłįnslé Hĭ uông lìng (talk) 09:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It almost definitely has something to do with the fact it's not standardised or possibly a different dialect Hĭ uông lìng (talk) 09:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dene-yenisean

Given that it's highly disputed, why is this here? Mr anonymous username (talk) 17:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]