Talk:Chinese ophthalmology

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 30 October 2015 by reviewer Yash! (talk · contribs).

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Traditional Chinese medicine on 21 November 2016. The result of the discussion was not merged.

Merge to Traditional Chinese medicine?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

[1] --BallenaBlanca (Talk) 02:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Makes sense to me Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Traditional Chinese medicine is already 140k and unwieldy; Ophthalmology is sufficiently distinct branch of medicine that it seems reasonable for Chinese Ophthalmology to have a distinct page. The further reading section alone suggests that there are more than enough references supporting this as a distinct topic. Klbrain (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]