Talk:Chinese ironclad Dingyuan
Chinese ironclad Dingyuan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 3, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Numeric accuracy
[edit]I came across this article when cleaning up "German gold mark". And I found this page say "In 1881, ..., 1.7 million taels of silver (6.2 million German gold mark)". I know that at least one of the two numbers are wrong.
Around that time, currency exchange rate did not float much. And it's usually proportional to the pure content of precious metal in the silver/gold coins. And I am certain of the following facts
- 1 Chinese yuan = 0.72 tael = 26.4 ~ 27 grams of 900‰ silver. Taking the average of the two, that means 1 yuan = 24.03 gram of pure silver.
- 1 gold mark = 5 grams of pure silver.
So 1.7 million taels
= (1.7 million / 0.72) yuan
= (1.7 million / 0.72 * 24.03) grams of silver
= (1.7 million / 0.72 * 24.03 / 5) German gold mark
≈ 11.35 million German gold mark
--Chochopk 04:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
File:Dingyuenmuseum1.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Dingyuenmuseum1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:55, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chinese ironclad Dingyuan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060629160117/http://www.d3.dion.ne.jp/~ironclad/wardroom/Foochow/foochow3.htm to http://www.d3.dion.ne.jp/~ironclad/wardroom/Foochow/foochow3.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- GA-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Chinese military history articles
- Chinese military history task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Shipwreck articles
- Low-importance Shipwreck articles