Talk:Chinese Temple and Settlement Site, Croydon

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Chinese Temple and Settlement Site, Croydon is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

It seems as if this listing was made relatively hurriedly after the site was discovered in 1997, and before more details were known, because it's very vague and out of date (on missing historical details) for a QHR entry, as the local council's page and this Gordon Grimwade journal article on the site make clear.

Among other things, the temple wasn't built until 1904, following a failed attempt in 1897, which is much later than the QHR implies. The Grimwade article, besides nailing down a number of dates and such, also has much more detail about the fabric of the site. This is one case where the article could really use a thorough rewrite away from the QHR content and including other sources, but it's a bit big a job for me. The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll flag it in my spreadsheet (I have a column for "problems"). This means I will revisit it once the new articles are rolled out. I have the Atherton Temple similarly flagged for merger. Kerry (talk) 04:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]