Talk:Chinese Immigration Act, 1923

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Typo?

"In November 2006, an Agreement-in-Principle to Highlight Chinese Canadians' Contribution to Building Canada was announced. Former Prime Minister Paul Martin also gave a personal apology for this Act." When did this even happen actually? Last year? --User:Fitzwilliam 04:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Harper gave a speech apologizing for the Act yesterday, perhaps it was contained in the speech? Kilter 17:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Background

What were the reasons behind passage of this Act? Racism, of course, but what else?

Rename

This article needs to be renamed to exclude the word "The". Deet 02:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that someone hurriedly changed the names, the redirects also need to be changed. Also we still have Chinese Immigration Act of 1885.--JimWae 03:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Chinese legislation in Canada

Propose merging the article noted in the subtitle with this one, for these reasons:

Skookum's comments in Talk:Anti-Chinese legislation in Canada are valid in my opinion.
It's not like there is a lot of different types of legislation listed in the Anti article. It is limited to the immigration legislation, which is discussed in more detail (including the controversy) here.

Deet 14:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate proposal: merge to History of Chinese immigration to Canada. --Usgnus 06:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense to me. So, how do we now go about doing that? Do we just cut and paste the info and then turn the old page into a redirect? Deet 23:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, but personally, I would change the merge tags and wait a week first. --Usgnus 23:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Special Circumstances?

What are these? Could someone clarify and add to the article? 199.185.84.10 16:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]